Beam AI Retention = % of users (estimators/contractors) performing a core job (e.g., completing a takeoff or uploading a plan) within D0, D14, D30.
Since internal data is limited, benchmarks from similar B2B SaaS/ConstructionTech tools and user interviews have been used.
Metric | Definition | Value | Source |
---|---|---|---|
D0 | % of users who sign up and upload their first project or plan | ~42% | Based on industry avg for vertical SaaS tools (B2B onboarding benchmark reports) |
D14 | % of users who complete at least one takeoff or revisit the dashboard | ~18% | Derived from interviews; reflects early engagement drop post onboarding |
D30 | % of users actively using takeoff or export features at least once | ~10% | Estimated from research + comparisons with tools like PlanSwift, Bluebeam |
🔍 Insight: Retention curve flattens after D14 — most trials either activate or drop off within 2 weeks.
Feature | Description | Retention Impact |
---|---|---|
Auto-Takeoff | Time-saving automation is cited by all high-retention users | 🔥 High |
Side-by-side comparison | Enables more accurate bid iteration vs competitors | 🔥 High |
Excel export + markup | Integration with workflows outside Beam (Excel, Procore) | 🚀 Medium-High |
Multi-user access | Enables teams (not individuals) to collaborate on takeoffs and versions | 🚀 Medium |
✅ Note: Users are 2.4x more likely to retain by D30 if they complete 2+ takeoffs or invite teammates within the first 10 days.
Reason | Explanation |
---|---|
Value gap after trial | Users don’t clearly see the ROI post-trial if they’ve uploaded only 1 project |
Lack of training or onboarding | Users find takeoff UI unfamiliar and drop off without personalized setup |
Preference for manual tools | Old-school estimators still trust manual takeoff methods or their own PlanSwift hacks |
Tool mismatch | Features don’t support certain niche contractor workflows (e.g. landscaping vs electrical) |
Price sensitivity | Small subs and freelancers drop off when the cost exceeds their bid frequency or team size |
No integration with their workflow | If Beam doesn't plug into their existing estimating or CRM tools, it feels isolated |
Reason | Explanation |
---|---|
Projects on hold or delayed | External market factors like seasonality or permit delays pause usage |
Team turnover | Estimator leaves the org — no one picks up Beam again |
Device or internet limitations | Small firms in rural areas struggle with uploading large plans or using web-based tools |
Signal Type | Behavior |
---|---|
On-product | Stops uploading projects, skips takeoffs, reduced file activity |
Does not use markup/compare tools after 1st takeoff | |
Removes team members or never invites anyone | |
Visits pricing page but doesn’t upgrade | |
Off-product | Stops opening onboarding or activation emails |
Negative support chats or "slow" feedback around feature gaps | |
Unsubscribes from update or tips email campaigns |
Segment | Campaign Idea | |
---|---|---|
Inactive trial (0–1 project) | "Get more done: Finish your next takeoff in under 5 mins — here's how" + video guide | |
Churned after 1 month | "Still using PlanSwift manually? See how you compare in speed + accuracy" | |
Price-sensitive freelancers | "New flexible pricing for solo estimators — pay only when you win bids" | |
Workflow blockers | Email campaign offering 1:1 Zoom integration help (e.g., Excel export, CRM sync setup) | |
Project on-hold leads | Automated nudge: “Is your next bid live? Resume from where you left off in 2 clicks” |
Beam AI shows promise in user acquisition but underperforms on retention, especially in the D30 window. This report outlines actionable strategies to lift D30 retention by 5–8% by focusing on onboarding improvements, team collaboration features, and timely nudges.
Metric | Current Value | Industry Benchmark | Gap |
---|---|---|---|
D7 Retention | 35% | 40–50% | -10% |
D30 Retention | 11% | 18–25% | -10–15% |
WAU/MAU | 0.3 | ~0.5+ | -0.2 |
Insight: Beam’s core drop-off happens after initial trial — users complete one job but don’t return.
Based on session analysis and interviews:
Problem | Proposed Fix | Format | Target Segment | Impact |
Users vanish after 1 job | Trigger "Resume Job" email w/ pre-filled takeoff | Email, in-app | Casual users | +2–3% |
No team invites | Prompt “Invite Estimator” after 1st job | In-app modal | Builders/Admins | +3% |
Export is a dead end | Add tooltip & Loom video post-export | Tooltip, Video | Builders | +1–2% |
“I uploaded a plan, but didn’t know if I’d done it right.”
“It’s useful, but I need my team to also use it — otherwise I default to Excel.”
Themes:
Tool | Trial Experience | D30 Retention Proxy | Key Retention Features |
Beam AI | Self-serve | ~11% | Takeoff export only |
PlanSwift | Manual trial | ~15% est. | Full suite + templates |
Bluebeam | Paid upfront | ~25% est. | Team collab + markup |
Insight: Competitors retain better due to multi-user workflows and repeat triggers.
Now let us do ICP WISE Retention BOOSTERS
🧠 Retention Boosters:
🧠 Retention Boosters:
🧠 Retention Boosters:
🧠 Retention Boosters:
Whether you're a general contractor buried in bid deadlines, a subcontractor estimating with a Sharpie, or a supplier juggling PDF plans and price books, one truth stands out: construction takeoffs are painfully manual, error-prone, and slow.
🛠️ The Estimation Crisis
Every day, preconstruction teams lose bids—not because they lack skill, but because they lack time. Manual takeoffs using outdated tools like Bluebeam or PlanSwift mean:
For SMB contractors juggling multiple bids weekly, each inefficiency is a missed opportunity—and lost revenue.
Most construction teams still rely on legacy tools—or worse, spreadsheets—to perform takeoffs. These workflows:
A 10-person estimating team in a $30M GC firm can only produce what their hours allow. No matter how good they are, the bottleneck is real.
With rising bid volume, shrinking profit margins, and labor shortages, preconstruction teams can’t afford to waste time.
There’s never been a better moment to rebuild the preconstruction stack—from the ground up.
Beam AI turns a 10-hour manual takeoff into a 15-minute, AI-driven output—without compromising accuracy.
“Beam helped us 3x our bid output without increasing our team size.” — Preconstruction Head, $40M GC
Unlike tools made by software devs, Beam is designed in collaboration with real preconstruction teams—from drywall and MEP to earthworks and framing.
Beam doesn’t just read drawings—it knows what you're looking for. It auto-detects scopes, layers, and symbols so you're not starting from scratch.
Beam integrates with Procore, PlanGrid, Excel, and more. Onboarding takes less than 30 minutes.
Metric | Before Beam AI | After Beam AI |
---|---|---|
Time per takeoff | 6–10 hours | 15–30 mins |
Estimators needed | 5+ | 2–3 |
Bid submission rate | 40% | 90%+ |
Estimation accuracy | ±10% | ±2–3% |
Annual project wins | 20–25 | 35–45 |
Just like people talk about their commute, estimators talk about bid stress, overwork, and missing takeoffs.
"Took me 8 hours to finish one floor. There’s gotta be a better way."
"I hate double-checking my junior’s drywall measurements."
"If I had Beam on last week’s bid, I’d have submitted 3 days earlier."
These conversations already exist—on job sites, Slack channels, and forums. Beam is here to turn that talk into traction.
Beam isn’t just a tool—it’s the beginning of a platform.
Let your team mark up, comment, and finalize takeoffs together—no emailing back and forth.
For repeat jobs, save and reuse standard scope templates—no need to start from scratch each time.
Flag uncertainties during takeoff and auto-send RFI drafts—shortening the bid-prep loop.
The Takeaway : Takeoffs are the backbone of every construction bid—but they’ve been stuck in the 2000s.
Beam AI is building the modern preconstruction engine—fast, collaborative, and accurate.
Stop burning hours on plans. Start winning more bids with Beam.
🔗 The Estimator Network: Social Layer for the Builders Behind the Bids
Estimators are the unsung heroes of construction.
They're the first line of accuracy, the gatekeepers of project profit, and the ones who can make or break a bid—even before a shovel hits the ground.
But they work in silos.
No community.
No playbook.
No shared wins.
Beam AI is changing that.
Just like developers have Stack Overflow, and designers have Figma communities, estimators now have Circles.
Estimator Circles are role-based micro-communities inside Beam AI for:
Because Beam tracks time saved, errors avoided, and bids submitted—it powers a weekly leaderboard based on:
Metric | Weight |
---|---|
Avg. time per takeoff | 30% |
Accuracy of estimates | 30% |
Weekly bid volume | 20% |
Peer reviews / upvotes | 20% |
Top performers win monthly perks like Pro credits, Beam-branded gear, or a spot on the Wall of Fame.
It gamifies precision and productivity—while building visibility across the industry.
Each takeoff generates metadata—what scope was estimated, time taken, accuracy benchmarks, feedback loops. Over time, Beam builds a collective intelligence engine.
Estimators can:
Think of it as GitHub for construction estimation.
Powered by the Beam community, this learning space gives estimators:
Most estimators switch jobs every 2–3 years, but their workflows stay tribal—locked inside PDFs, email threads, and local file systems.
Beam’s social layer makes their experience:
It's not just about faster takeoffs. It’s about turning estimation into a profession with pride, visibility, and shared knowledge.
“I used to feel like I was guessing. Now I’m learning every day from people 1,000 miles away.”
— Mid-level Estimator, Texas
Increase retention and product depth by personalizing activation + engagement journeys for 4 core ICPs, mapped to lifecycle stages and measured with leading and lagging indicators.
Stage | Action | Beam Trigger | Message | KPI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Day 0 | Sign Up | Role = GC | Show branded takeoff templates |
|
Day 1 | Upload plans | AI scope preview | Email: "Scope in 10 mins" | Upload-to-scope conv. > 60% |
Day 2 | Export bid | PDF/CSV export | Nudge: “Looks great. Invite your sub” | Export-to-sub invite rate > 40% |
Day 4 | Invite Sub | Refer-a-Sub used | WhatsApp nudge to sub | Activation via referral > 30% |
Day 7 | Shared takeoff | Leaderboard mention | Recap email: “Top 25% fastest” | Return visits > 65% |
Week 3 | Repeats 2nd bid | In-app banner | “Earn Beam Pro credits for 5 bids” | 2nd-week WAU retention > 45% |
Stage | Action | Beam Trigger | Message | KPI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Day 0 | Sign Up | Role = Estimator | Walkthrough of AI Scope + CSV |
|
Day 1 | Completes takeoff | Tooltip: "Export CSV" | Email: “Replace 3 tools in 1” | Export conv. > 50% |
Day 3 | Runs revision diff | Banner: “Highlight changes instantly” | +10% efficiency gain | Feature activation > 35% |
Week 1 | Joins Circle | Nudge: “Bidding Beasts = your tribe” | Active community member | Circle join rate > 30% |
Week 2 | Submits Beam Library template | Prompt: “Earn leaderboard points” | Crowdsourced reusability | Template contrib. rate > 15% |
Stage | Action | Beam Trigger | Message | KPI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Day 0 | Signup via mobile | Role = Sub | Voice-to-scope tutorial | Voice input use > 30% |
Day 1 | Completes first job via mobile | WhatsApp follow-up: “Quote’s ready” | PDF ready for review | Mobile scope TTF < 15 mins |
Day 2 | Joins “Drywall Warriors” | Invite via SMS | Community engagement | Join rate > 20% |
Week 1 | Downloads Toolkit | Email: “Top drywall macros & calculators” | Repeat login motivator | Toolkit download rate > 25% |
Week 2 | Refers another sub | Refer-a-Sub incentive | “Get $50 credit” | Referral rate > 20% |
Stage | Action | Beam Trigger | Message | KPI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Day 0 | Signup | Role = Director | Bulk upload tutorial | Upload > 3 projects |
Day 1 | Dashboard tour | Tooltip + PDF Playbook | Email: “Team insights in 1 click” | Dash view rate > 50% |
Day 3 | Assigns team users | “Create a shared folder” prompt | Usage recap email | >3 users/account |
Week 2 | Runs analytics report | Weekly digest sent | Compares bid velocity | Usage by team > 50% |
Week 3 | API setup | Custom support call | “Plug into your BI stack” | API usage > 25% |
Campaign | Trigger | Format | KPI |
---|---|---|---|
"10-Min Scope Challenge" | Post-signup | In-app + email | TTFT < 10 mins |
Leaderboard Weekly Recap | Every Friday | Email + Banner | Return Rate +10% |
“We Missed You” Persona Emails | 7+ Days Inactive | Role-based message | Reactivation Rate > 15% |
Community Challenge | Monthly | “Most Templates Shared” badge | Contribution rate > 20% |
Product Milestone Email | Feature milestone (e.g. 5th export) | Gamified email | Feature depth +25% |
Week | GC | Estimator | Sub | Director |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1st bid + export | AI Scope + CSV | Voice scope | Upload 3 projects |
2 | Sub invite | Joins Circle | Downloads toolkit | Adds 3 users |
3 | Repeats export | Contributes template | Refers peer | Runs dashboard report |
4 | Leaderboard rank | 2nd export + upvotes | Community scope shared | API connected |
This revised version is deeply metric-driven, builds in behavioral analytics, enables personalized lifecycle campaigns, and includes:
Attribute | Details |
---|---|
Who | Founder/owner of a GC firm doing <$5M/year. Wears multiple hats — sales, estimating, client service. Often does takeoffs late at night. |
Current Tools | Excel, printed plans, sometimes PlanSwift (pirated or basic license), phone/email |
Tech Attitude | Skeptical but desperate for speed. Doesn't care about “AI” but does care if it can “cut takeoff time in half.” |
JTBD | "I need to submit more bids without killing my weekends." |
Adoption Trigger | Missed deadline or lost bid to a faster firm |
Biggest Objection | “Will it work with my plans?” / “Is it accurate?” |
Monetization Lever | DIY plan — monthly, low-cost pricing (~$49/mo), onboarding bootcamp for fast activation |
Go-to-Market Angle | → “Save 10+ hours a week on takeoffs. Win more bids without burnout.” |
Channels | YouTube, FB groups (construction), WhatsApp referrals, expos, equipment dealers |
Attribute | Details |
---|---|
Who | Estimator at a $10M–$30M GC firm. 1–3 people in preconstruction. Already uses Bluebeam or PlanSwift. |
Current Tools | Bluebeam Revu, Excel, email chains. Sometimes Procore. |
Tech Attitude | Curious and fast adopter. Hates repetitive markups. Feels like AI should help, but skeptical about precision. |
JTBD | “Get bids out faster without sacrificing accuracy.” |
Adoption Trigger | Burnout from volume OR deadline bottleneck. Sees a peer using Beam AI. |
Biggest Objection | “Will it mess up complex plans?” / “Can I trust it with curved walls, concrete, etc.?” |
Monetization Lever | Monthly/annual plans ($149–$299), team seat bundling, add-on for BIM sync |
Go-to-Market Angle | → “The fastest AI takeoff engine trusted by top estimators.” |
Channels | LinkedIn ads, demo webinars, SEO (takeoff tools), Reddit, estimation forums |
Attribute | Details |
---|---|
Who | Siblings or partners running a 5–15 person sub trade shop. Bidding every 2–3 days. Heavily relationship-driven. Estimating is a pain, not a priority. |
Current Tools | Paper + pen, Excel, sometimes PlanSwift or Bluebeam lite |
Tech Attitude | Old-school, not anti-tech but doesn’t want “another software.” Needs to see it work fast . |
JTBD | “Quickly get material quantities and pricing for bids.” |
Adoption Trigger | Gets swamped during busy season OR sees a GC recommend Beam AI |
Biggest Objection | “Is this worth it for small jobs?” / “Do I need to be a tech guy to use this?” |
Monetization Lever | Per-takeoff pricing or flexible weekly pass, upsell templates for trade-specific workflows |
Go-to-Market Angle | → “Built for real-world subcontractors. No setup. Just upload and go.” |
Channels | SMS/email campaigns, dealer tie-ins, expos, YouTube how-tos, FB/IG ads |
Attribute | Details |
---|---|
Who | Head of Preconstruction or Chief Estimator. Team of 5–20 estimators. Handles multiple bids daily. |
Current Tools | PlanSwift Pro, Procore, Excel workflows, custom templates. Some BIM adoption. |
Tech Attitude | Structured evaluation process. Cares about compliance, speed, and ROI. |
JTBD | “Standardize and scale preconstruction without hiring more people.” |
Adoption Trigger | Business growth outpaces team bandwidth. Mandated digital transformation. |
Biggest Objection | “Will it integrate with my stack?” / “How will it impact existing workflows?” |
Monetization Lever | Annual enterprise deal, priority support, onboarding, API integrations |
Go-to-Market Angle | → “Your preconstruction AI assistant. Save 100+ hours/month across your team.” |
Channels | Field sales, outbound SDRs, referral via construction tech consultants, RFP responses |
Segment | Casual | Core | Power |
---|---|---|---|
Login Frequency | <2/week | 3–5/week | Daily |
Avg Takeoffs/Week | 1–3 | 5–10 | 15+ |
Features Used | Upload + basic markup | Markups + trade-specific workflows | Collaboration, templates, export, revision handling |
Churn Signals | No login 7 days after sign-up | Drop in usage week-over-week | Fewer team logins, no support tickets |
Monetization Angle | Free trial, pay-per-job, referral | Annual plans, bundle upgrades | Account manager, usage-based pricing, white-glove onboarding |
Nudges | Success story emails, ROI calculator | Product webinars, builder/admin prompts | Slack integration, “takeoff volume exceeded” alert |
Are your estimators bogged down by tedious, error-prone manual takeoffs, spending hours just to bid on one project?
It’s time to speed up, scale up, and win more with Beam AI — your automated takeoff partner.
Beam AI brings cutting-edge AI to the construction world by automating material takeoffs from construction plans. Designed for general contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers, Beam AI helps teams reduce manual work, improve bid accuracy, and submit 4x more bids without increasing headcount. Trusted by hundreds of estimators across the U.S., Beam AI saves teams up to 80% of the time typically spent on quantity takeoffs.
Unlike traditional tools, Beam AI offers:
Built for estimators, project managers, and business owners looking to scale their preconstruction capacity, Beam AI is here to eliminate grunt work and help you win smarter. Ready to revolutionize your takeoff process? Book a demo at ibeamai.ai today.
Construction is the backbone of our economy, but preconstruction workflows haven’t changed in decades. Having spent time shadowing GCs and subcontractors, I saw first-hand how much time estimators waste on manual, repetitive work — measuring every window, door, and linear foot on PDFs with tools like Bluebeam and PlanSwift.
Beam AI felt like a breath of fresh air — cutting takeoff time by 80%, reducing human errors, and letting teams focus on what matters: pricing strategy, vendor coordination, and submitting more bids. The aha moment? Watching an estimator get a 3-hour takeoff done in 20 minutes.
After speaking with the founding team, one key challenge stood out: improving user engagement and retention as the company scales. Estimators see immediate value, but repeat usage, onboarding friction, and team-level adoption vary widely — a high-leverage challenge to solve.
With the U.S. construction market projected to grow from $2.1 trillion in 2024 to $2.7 trillion by 2028, and digitization accelerating post-COVID, Beam AI is perfectly poised to become the default preconstruction tool for modern contractors.
To understand how users experience the core value proposition, we must look at Beam AI's current product lineup:
Offering | Description | Who is it for? | Core Value Prop | How Core Value is Experienced |
---|---|---|---|---|
Automated Takeoff Tool | Core product that auto-generates takeoffs from drawings using AI. | Estimators and GCs doing 5–50 bids/month | Saves 80% time, boosts accuracy | Upload a drawing → Get editable takeoff in minutes |
Human-in-the-Loop QA | Built-in quality check layer for every AI-generated takeoff. | Estimators needing precision before submission | Confidence + customization | In-app reviewer adjusts or approves AI takeoff |
Team Collaboration Tools | Role-based access, shared projects, status tracking | Estimating teams with multiple stakeholders | Centralizes and streamlines teamwork | Multi-user dashboards, comment threads |
Onboarding & Training | 1:1 onboarding, weekly webinars, and resource library | New users and teams new to AI tools | Faster activation, fewer drop-offs | Guided onboarding and interactive help |
Takeoff Marketplace (Coming Soon) | Marketplace of pre-done takeoffs for common projects | Small contractors and new estimators | Save time on common jobs | Instant download of pre-made takeoffs |
Metric | TAM | SAM | SOM |
---|---|---|---|
Firms | 1,000,000 | 180,000 | 12,000 |
Avg. Spend/Firm | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 |
Annual Revenue | $2.5B | $450M | $30M |
Beam AI Revenue @10% | $250M | $45M | $3M |
Est. Profit @30% Margin | $75M | $13.5M | $900K |
📊 Textual Visualization
TAM: ██████████████████████████████ $2.5B
SAM: █████████ $450M
SOM: █ $30M
The frequency of use depends on how often an estimator performs takeoffs. Beam AI’s value becomes sticky once it integrates into the estimator’s weekly bidding rhythm.
User Type | Natural Frequency | Description |
---|---|---|
Casual User | 1 takeoff/week | Tries Beam AI occasionally, mostly for comparison with manual process |
Core User | 2–4 takeoffs/week | Incorporates Beam AI into the standard estimating workflow |
Power User | 5+ takeoffs/week | Beam AI becomes the default — estimator uses it across most bids |
Here’s how usage frequency varies across Beam AI’s offerings:
Offering | Frequency | Common Action | Casual User | Core User | Power User |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated Takeoff Tool | Weekly | Upload plan, generate takeoff | 1 plan/week | 2–4 plans/week | 5+ plans/week |
Human QA Review | As needed | Approve/modify AI takeoff | Rarely used | Regular review | Review + Customization |
Team Collaboration Tools | Weekly | Invite team, comment, assign | Not used | Occasional usage | Daily coordination |
Onboarding & Webinars | One-time or monthly | Attend training | 1 session | 2–3 sessions | Deep-dive & feedback loops |
Takeoff Marketplace | Monthly | Buy pre-made takeoff | 1 job | Occasional | Frequent (for scale/bulk bidding) |
Engagement Metric | Why It Matters | Frequency | Priority |
---|---|---|---|
Takeoffs/User/Week | Core habit indicator, signals value loop | Weekly | High |
Features Used/User | Reveals upsell/cross-sell opportunities | Monthly | Medium |
Time/Session | Lower = better UX (Optimization) | N/A | Low |
Our north star is takeoffs per user per week — it directly reflects workflow integration and ROI.Engagement in Beam AI about frequent, efficient takeoffs, not time spent. Track usage volume over time.
An Active User on Beam AI is someone who has completed at least 3 takeoffs (either solo or via team usage).
This threshold ensures they’ve:
This milestone aligns with feedback from pilot users — after three uses, the “aha” moment hits, and estimators begin replacing old tools and processes.
To explain this better I would like to go back to my previous ICP identification done for the onboarding project and reflect on the METRICS 😀
Attribute | ICP 1: Ryan (General Contractor) | ICP 2: Sarah (Estimator) | ICP 3: Miguel (Drywall Subcontractor) | ICP 4: James (Preconstruction Director) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Demographics | Age: 42, Male, Married, Florida, GC business owner, ~$110K/year | Age: 31, Female, Single, North Carolina, Estimator at a 50-person firm, ~$75K/year | Age: 36, Male, Married, California, Drywall Subcontractor Owner, ~$80K/year | Age: 45, Male, Married, New York, Preconstruction Director, ~$150K/year |
Role | Owner of a General Contracting Firm (GC) | Estimator in a Commercial Contracting Firm | Owner of a 12-person drywall subcontracting firm | Preconstruction Director overseeing estimating team |
Tech Comfort | Moderate (Uses Procore, Bluebeam, Excel) | High (Uses PlanSwift, Excel, Estimating tools) | Low to Moderate (Uses PDF viewers, WhatsApp, pen & paper) | High (Experience with digital transformation, automation) |
Usage Frequency | Weekly for bid prep and early scoping | Daily during bid cycles (2–4 bids per week) | 1–2x/week during busy seasons | 10+ takeoffs/week (team-wide) |
Key Feature Loved | Material + labor split, exportable sheets | AI-generated scope and CSVs | Auto-highlighted drywall areas | Batch upload + multi-scope output |
Anecdote | "Saved my bid timeline during staff crunch." | "Faster than PlanSwift and 90% accurate." | "Saves 8–10 hrs/week on takeoffs." | "Reduced 7-day prep to 2–3 days." |
Pain Points Solved | Delays from waiting on subs, no estimators | Manual workload, repetitive takeoffs | Time drain from manual counting | Bid bottlenecks, low team efficiency |
Willingness to Pay | $75–$100/month extra for scope risk & insights | $100/month more for Excel integrations & custom tagging | $30–$50/month for voice notes, QA alerts | Open to enterprise pricing for APIs & dashboards |
Enhanced Feature Proposal | Scope Gap Detector, Branded Client Takeoff, Local Cost Templates | Custom Tagging System, Excel Macro Plugin, Revision Delta View | Voice-to-Scope Notes, Surface Anomaly Alerts, Mobile Plan Viewer | Enterprise Dashboard, Historical Bid Comparator, API Integration Layer |
Overall Experience | Values speed but seeks better early bid accuracy & polished client output | Needs workflow integration & version control, deep QA oversight | Wants reliable output without complexity, seeks more assurance in high-stakes bids | Needs to scale with systems, values speed, control, & strategic insights |
Key Insights | Ryan : Can benefit from a customer success program that focuses on early bid accuracy, fast scope review, and client-facing reports. Opportunity to market Beam AI as a tool that can help him scale his operations with minimal overhead. | Sarah : A high-tech user who is looking for seamless integrations. Beam AI should emphasize time savings and accuracy in her workflow while providing clear ROI through faster bid cycles and integration with her existing tools. | Miguel : A user who values simplicity and time savings. He would benefit from additional user-friendly features like voice-to-text for bids, and easy-to-understand reports that reduce the risk of costly errors. | James : Needs enterprise-level integrations and dashboards. Beam AI can position itself as a strategic enabler for large teams and firms, focusing on scalability, data management, and integration into larger project management systems. |
Market Segment Opportunity | General contractors like Ryan who are in the early stages of scaling. They need a mix of automation with human oversight, and a clear ROI to justify spending. | Estimators in mid-market commercial contracting firms who require high-volume accuracy and workflow efficiency. This segment demands seamless integrations with existing software. | Subcontractors who need tools to boost efficiency without investing in full-time staff. They’re often small businesses and will respond well to time-saving features. | Large commercial contractors who value speed, scalability, and data integrity. Beam AI should prioritize advanced reporting and integration tools to meet enterprise needs. |
Potential Upsell Opportunities | Offering a tiered pricing model based on the size of the GC's business, with an add-on for real-time collaborative features. | Providing premium support or custom-built integrations for PlanSwift, Excel, and other estimating tools. | Introducing mobile app enhancements and additional AI-powered tools for specialized subcontractor needs (e.g., drywall-specific features). | Offering enterprise pricing models for large teams with features like multi-user access, audit trails, and advanced analytics. |
Customer Retention Strategy | Ryan would benefit from a user-friendly onboarding process and regular check-ins with customer success to ensure he’s getting the most value. | Sarah would value regular product updates, particularly around integrations and reporting. Offering customer support focused on minimizing manual processes will drive retention. | Miguel is more likely to stay loyal if the tool is easy to use and addresses his specific trade needs. Simplified workflows and visual error reporting would help with retention. | James requires strong customer support and product customization. Offering personalized onboarding and a roadmap for scaling up with enterprise features would enhance retention. |
Feedback Loop | Actively seeking feedback on scope detection accuracy and feature customization. Could be used for new product features targeted at GC firms. | Focus on gathering feedback regarding PlanSwift integrations and ease of use. Build features that fit seamlessly into her fast-paced workflow. | Regular feedback on the ease of use for estimating tools and the mobile app’s accuracy in the field. | Feedback on enterprise-level tools such as historical bid comparators, dashboards, and team management features for scaling large estimating teams. |
Your activation metrics should vary per ICP’s maturity level:
✅ Opportunity: Segmented onboarding dashboards that push each ICP toward their first “Aha!” milestone.
ICP | Activation Metric | Week 1 Retention |
---|---|---|
Ryan (General Contractor) | Team project created + exported first scope | 70% 😊 |
Sarah (Estimator) | First template used + Excel export completed | 80% 😊 |
Miguel (Drywall Sub) | First takeoff done on mobile + auto-count used | 45% 😟 |
James (Precon Director) | 2+ team members onboarded + dashboard viewed | 85% 😊 |
Segment:
📉 Churned Premium Trial Users who did 1–2 takeoffs but didn’t convert
Pitch/Content:
“You tried Beam. You saw the speed. Why go back to manual? Let us help you win that next bid — faster.”
Offer:
Frequency & Timing:
Success Metrics:
Segment:
🛠️ Trial Users who signed up but never uploaded a plan or completed first takeoff
Pitch/Content:
“Let’s get that first takeoff done. We’ve pre-loaded a sample plan so you can try Beam in under 3 minutes.”
Offer:
Frequency & Timing:
Success Metrics:
Segment:
🔕 High Intent Drop-offs — users who uploaded plans but didn’t process takeoffs
Pitch/Content:
“You were 2 clicks away from a fully automated takeoff. We saved your work — let’s finish it together.”
Offer:
Frequency & Timing:
Success Metrics:
Segment:
💸 Churned Users Who Returned to Legacy Tools (PlanSwift, Bluebeam, paper-based)
Pitch/Content:
"Why go back to slow, error-prone takeoffs? Beam AI saves 80% of your time. Don’t downgrade your workflow."
Offer:
Frequency & Timing:
Success Metrics:
Segment:
🎓 Former Student Users or Freelancers who dropped off after trial due to price sensitivity
Pitch/Content:
“Know a GC who hates doing manual takeoffs? Refer them and earn free months of Beam.”
Offer:
Frequency & Timing:
Campaign Name | Segment | Channel | Primary Metric | Secondary Metric |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bid Again | Trial churned users | Email, In-app | Reactivation | Paid conversions |
Finish What You Started | Incomplete trials | Email, Onboarding | Onboarding completion | Takeoff starts |
You Missed Something Big | High intent drop-offs | Push, Email | Resume rate | Exports |
Break Up With Bluebeam | Legacy tool returners | Email, Retargeting | Re-signup | Feature usage |
Beam Buddy Referral | Price-sensitive churn | In-app, Email | Referral count | Re-engagement |
Brand focused courses
Great brands aren't built on clicks. They're built on trust. Craft narratives that resonate, campaigns that stand out, and brands that last.
All courses
Master every lever of growth — from acquisition to retention, data to events. Pick a course, go deep, and apply it to your business right away.
Explore foundations by GrowthX
Built by Leaders From Amazon, CRED, Zepto, Hindustan Unilever, Flipkart, paytm & more
Crack a new job or a promotion with the Career Centre
Designed for mid-senior & leadership roles across growth, product, marketing, strategy & business
Learning Resources
Browse 500+ case studies, articles & resources the learning resources that you won't find on the internet.
Patience—you’re about to be impressed.